Authors
Julio Flores, Esther García, Francisco Pedroche and Miguel Romance
Journal Paper
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5128567
Publisher URL
Publication date
February 2020
Measures of centrality in networks defined by means of matrix algebra, like PageRank-type centralities, have been used for over 70 years. Recently, new extensions of PageRank have been formulated and may include a personalization (or teleportation) vector. It is accepted that one of the key issues for any centrality measure formulation is to what extent someone can control its variability. In this paper, we compare the limits of variability of two centrality measures for complex networks that we call classic PageRank (PR) and biplex approach PageRank (BPR). Both centrality measures depend on the so-called damping parameter αα that controls the quantity of teleportation. Our first result is that the intersection of the intervals of variation of both centrality measures is always a nonempty set. Our second result is that when αα is lower that 0.480.48 (and, therefore, the ranking is highly affected by teleportation effects) then the upper limits of PR are more controllable than the upper limits of BPR; on the contrary, when αα is greater than 0.50.5 (and we recall that the usual PageRank algorithm uses the value 0.850.85), then the upper limits of PR are less controllable than the upper limits of BPR, provided certain mild assumptions on the local structure of the graph. Regarding the lower limits of variability, we give a result for small values of αα. We illustrate the results with some analytical networks and also with a real Facebook network.





